Enhancing Electoral Decision-Making: A Social Learning Network Election Decision Support System Utilizing AHP and PROMETHEE Methods

Authors

  • Aisyah Alesha Ideas for Future Research and Technology, Indonesia
  • Romasinta Simbolon Community Development, Institute of Computer Science, Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • Juliana Batubara Community Development, Institute of Computer Science, Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • Firta Sari Panjaitan Community Development, Yayasan Dermawan Cendikiawan Bersatu, Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

Keywords:

Social Learning Networks, Electoral Decision-Making, Decision Support Systems, PROMETHEE, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Abstract

This In today's digital age, the intersection of technology, democracy, and citizen participation has become increasingly prominent. This research explores the development and application of a Social Learning Network Election Decision Support System (SLNEDSS) using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) methods to enhance electoral decision-making processes. By leveraging social learning networks as platforms for information dissemination and deliberative discourse, SLNEDSS empowers citizens to make informed choices that reflect their values, aspirations, and preferences. The integration of AHP and PROMETHEE methods within SLNEDSS provides users with structured frameworks for evaluating electoral alternatives, synthesizing stakeholder preferences, and facilitating transparent and systematic decision-making processes. Through empirical studies, the effectiveness of SLNEDSS in enhancing the quality and inclusivity of electoral outcomes is demonstrated, highlighting its transformative potential in shaping the future of democratic governance. The research also identifies challenges and limitations associated with SLNEDSS, such as algorithmic biases and user adoption, and suggests directions for future research to address these shortcomings. Ultimately, this research contributes to advancing the frontiers of knowledge and innovation in the field of electoral decision support systems, paving the way for a more informed, inclusive, and responsive democracy in the digital age.

References

D. Simpson, “A Global Advance in Civic Engagement,” GLOBALLY, p. 381, 2021.

S. Rokkan, Citizens, elections, parties: Approaches to the comparative study of the processes of development. ECPR Press, 2009.

J. M. Carey, Legislative voting and accountability. Cambridge University Press, 2008.

C. Wells, The civic organization and the digital citizen: Communicating engagement in a networked age. Oxford University Press, 2015.

A.-L. Barabási, “Time and Networks in Mobile Communication”.

M. Pelling and C. High, “Understanding adaptation: what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity?,” Glob. Environ. Chang., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 308–319, 2005.

Y. Benkler, R. Faris, and H. Roberts, Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press, 2018.

P. K. Sabah, “Social Networking Sites and Political Campaigns in a Pandemic: An Assessment of Ghana’s 2020 Presidential Elections.” Ghana Institute of Journalism, 2021.

M. Andrejevic, Infoglut: How too much information is changing the way we think and know. Routledge, 2013.

P. R. Messinger et al., “Virtual worlds—past, present, and future: New directions in social computing,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 204–228, 2009.

J. B Strother, J. M Ulijn, and Z. Fazal, “INFORMATION OVERLOADAn International Challenge forProfessional Engineers andTechnical Communicators.” Wiley-Blackwell, 2023.

J. Penney, The citizen marketer: Promoting political opinion in the social media age. Oxford University Press, 2017.

R. Cong, J. Lei, H. Fu, M.-M. Cheng, W. Lin, and Q. Huang, “Review of visual saliency detection with comprehensive information,” IEEE Trans. circuits Syst. Video Technol., vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 2941–2959, 2018.

E. H. Forman and M. A. Selly, Decision by objectives: how to convince others that you are right. World Scientific, 2001.

S. Sipahi and M. Timor, “The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications,” Manag. Decis., vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 775–808, 2010.

M. Sikalo, A. Arnaut-Berilo, and A. Delalic, “A Combined AHP-PROMETHEE Approach for Portfolio Performance Comparison,” Int. J. Financ. Stud., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 46, 2023.

J. Malczewski, “Spatial multicriteria decision analysis,” in Spatial multicriteria decision making and analysis, Routledge, 2019, pp. 11–48.

B. Kanra, Islam, democracy and dialogue in Turkey: deliberating in divided societies. Routledge, 2016.

C. Sam, “Intelligent decision support systems for managing the diffusion of social computing in school-based ubiquitous learning.” 2022.

M. Anastasiadou, V. Santos, and F. Montargil, “Which technology to which challenge in democratic governance? An approach using design science research,” Transform. Gov. People, Process policy, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 512–531, 2021.

P. Dahlgren, Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication and democracy. Cambridge University Press, 2009.

N. Rane, “Integrating leading-edge artificial intelligence (AI), internet of things (IOT), and big data technologies for smart and sustainable architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry: Challenges and future directions,” Eng. Constr. Ind. Challenges Futur. Dir. (September 24, 2023), 2023.

G. Mannina, T. F. Rebouças, A. Cosenza, M. Sànchez-Marrè, and K. Gibert, “Decision support systems (DSS) for wastewater treatment plants–a review of the state of the art,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 290, p. 121814, 2019.

J. Kropczynski, G. Cai, and J. M. Carroll, “Understanding the roles of artifacts in democratic deliberation from the Citizens’ Initiative Review,” J. Soc. Media Organ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2015.

J. Kazmaier and J. H. van Vuuren, “A generic framework for sentiment analysis: Leveraging opinion-bearing data to inform decision making,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 135, p. 113304, 2020.

M. Cinelli, M. Kadziński, G. Miebs, M. Gonzalez, and R. Słowiński, “Recommending multiple criteria decision analysis methods with a new taxonomy-based decision support system,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 302, no. 2, pp. 633–651, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-30

How to Cite

Alesha, A., Simbolon , R., Batubara, J., & Panjaitan, F. S. (2024). Enhancing Electoral Decision-Making: A Social Learning Network Election Decision Support System Utilizing AHP and PROMETHEE Methods. Journal of Computer Science and Research (JoCoSiR), 2(1), 24–31. Retrieved from http://journal.aptikomsumut.org/index.php/jocosir/article/view/36